Not just what's exposed. What it enables

Q: Does GuardianGaze exploit vulnerabilities to create ATT&CK mappings?

No. Nothing is exploited, every finding is observed from the public internet without touching your systems.

Q: Is every finding mapped to MITRE?

Each finding carries its tactic and technique alongside severity, evidence, remediation and the compliance control it breaks.

Q: Which ATT&CK version is supported?

Our mapping is continuously updated to align with the latest MITRE ATT&CK framework versions, ensuring your exposure reflects current threat landscapes.

Q: Can mappings be exported?

Yes. All tactic and technique mappings are included in the standard finding payloads retrieved through our REST API or can be exported directly.

Q: Does this show detection coverage?

Yes. Start with a domain you own and keep the resulting report whether or not you proceed.

Q: Is this equivalent to red-team testing?

No. The mapping tells you which techniques your exposures would enable; a red team tells you whether your detection and response actually hold up.

Every Guardian Gaze finding maps to the MITRE ATT&CK tactic and technique it could support so your team sees the intrusion path, not just the weakness.

See My Mapping Free →View Example

Observed onlyNothing exploited

Turn findings into attacker context

Tactic

Why the attacker would use it

Each finding is placed against the tactic it serves: the objective an attacker is pursuing, not just the weakness itself.

Technique

How they could use it

Findings map down to technique level, so the path from an exposure to an actual intrusion is explicit rather than implied.

Coverage

Where your external exposure is concentrated

Mapping findings across tactics shows which stages of an intrusion you would struggle to detect or interrupt.

One finding. Full context.

Finding	DMARC policy left at p=none across three sending domains
Tactic	Initial Access
Technique	Phishing, an unenforced policy lets mail be spoofed as your domain
Evidence	The published DNS records that produced the finding
Compliance	The mapped control this breaks, across the frameworks you have enabled
Remediation	The record change required, with an SLA attached

What you gain

Tactic + technique per finding
Exposure view by intrusion stage
Shared language with SOC/IR teams
Clear "so what?" for findings

What it does not claim

No exploitation
Not a pentest
Not a red-team engagement
Does not measure internal detection coverage

Customer Story

“ATT&CK mapping helps our SOC understand external findings in the same language we already use internally”

SOC Manager

Common questions

Does GuardianGaze exploit vulnerabilities to create ATT&CK mappings?

Which ATT&CK version is supported?

Does this show detection coverage?

Is every finding mapped to MITRE?

Can mappings be exported?

Is this equivalent to red-team testing?

ATT&CK context travels with the finding.

Technical reports show detailed tactic/technique mapping. Executive views summarize the pattern without overwhelming leadership with framework detail.

See which techniques your exposure could enable

MITRE ATT&CK mapping is included with the assessment.

Request Free Rating