Partners · Enterprise

Workflow integrations
and channel partners.

Guardian Gaze pushes findings to the tools your team already uses. We also work with consultancies and MSSPs who deliver continuous external monitoring as a managed service.

Workflow integrations

Push findings to your stack

Findings reach your queue within minutes of detection, and status updates flow back automatically. Signed payloads throughout.

  • Slack and Microsoft Teams for alerting
  • Jira and ServiceNow for ticketing
  • PagerDuty for on-call escalation
  • Email and signed webhook delivery
  • SSO and SAML on the dashboard
  • Scoped cloud connections for posture assessment
Channel partners

For MSSPs and consultancies

The platform is multi-tenant by design, with role-based access and per-tenant data isolation.

MSSPs

Managed service delivery

Multi-tenant management: many client organisations from one console, per-tenant SSO and data isolation, co-branded reporting, and volume pricing per managed customer.

Consultancies

Advisory engagements

Bundle Guardian Gaze ratings into advisory work, RFP support or vendor due-diligence engagements. Pay-per-assessment or annual licensing.

Who this suits

Three kinds of partner, three different economics

Managed security providers already carry the client relationship and the alert triage capability. Ratings extend what they can offer into third-party and supply-chain risk without adding headcount, because assessment needs no access to a client's environment and no cooperation from the vendors being rated.

Consultancies running vendor risk or due diligence engagements use ratings to compress the discovery phase. The work that previously took a fortnight of questionnaire chasing arrives in a day, which changes the shape of the engagement from data-gathering to advice, where the margin actually is.

Insurance brokers and MGAs rate books rather than individual risks, for triage at submission and to understand accumulation across a portfolio. Pricing scaling with rated companies rather than seats is what makes rating a whole book workable instead of sampling it.

The commercial shape

No per-seat charge, and no module upsell

Two things make partner economics predictable. There is no per-seat charge, so a consultancy putting six analysts on an engagement does not pay six times. And all six modules ship in every tier, so there is no scenario where a partner discovers mid-engagement that the finding they need is behind an upgrade.

Pricing scales with the number of companies rated. For a partner that means cost tracks the size of the engagement rather than the size of the team, which is the right direction for anyone whose delivery model is people.

White-label reporting matters for the same reason it matters to agencies on the WordPress side: a report a partner can put their own name on is the difference between reselling a tool and delivering a service.

What we ask

Accuracy feedback, because it is the whole product

The thing we want from partners is not pipeline. It is findings feedback, attribution that was wrong, a version match that was a backported patch, a lookalike domain that turned out to be a client's own regional reseller.

Partners see far more organisations than we do, across sectors we do not, which makes them the fastest route to knowing where the model is weak. Every rating platform lives or dies on whether its findings survive a sceptical practitioner, and practitioners are exactly who partners employ.

In return, partners get direct access to the research team rather than a support queue, and roadmap influence proportional to how much of the model they are helping correct.

FAQ

Common questions

Is there a per-seat charge for partner teams?

No. Pricing scales with the number of companies rated rather than the number of users, which is the right direction for any delivery model built on people.

Do partners get all modules?

Yes, all six ship in every tier. There is no scenario where you discover mid-engagement that the finding you need is behind an upgrade.

Can we white-label reports for our clients?

Yes. A report you can put your own name on is the difference between reselling a tool and delivering a service.

What do you want from partners?

Findings feedback more than pipeline. Partners see more organisations across more sectors than we do, which makes them the fastest route to knowing where the model is weak.

Can brokers rate an entire book?

Yes, and accumulation across the book is usually the value most often missed, correlated dependency turns one provider incident into a portfolio loss event rather than independent claims.

Become a partner

We are onboarding partner organisations during 2026. Send a short note through the contact form.

We respond within 24 hours.